<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Warren William and Gene Lockhart Star in Times Square Playboy (1936)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://warrenwilliam.com/times-square-playboy-1936/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://warrenwilliam.com/times-square-playboy-1936/</link>
	<description>1930&#039;s &#38; 1940&#039;s Film Star Warren William Tribute Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:53:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Mouthpiece</title>
		<link>http://warrenwilliam.com/times-square-playboy-1936/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Mouthpiece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 09:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrenwilliam.com/?p=772#comment-836</guid>
		<description>Hi Jeffers, glad I did &lt;em&gt;Times Square Playboy&lt;/em&gt; justice, told you I liked it!  I enjoyed June Travis, reminded me just a smidge of Kay Francis as well.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2008/may/20/obituaries.usa&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Here&#039;s a little more on her&lt;/a&gt;, the only obituary I could dig up.  It was definitely nice not to hear Barton MacLane&#039;s teeth gritting through his standard tough guy role, not that I&#039;m not a fan of the nastier Bart, but this made for a good change of pace.  

C&#039;mon, you know you want to become a customer next.  Actually, I do a lot of mini-biographies and non-WW film reviews over on Immortal Ephemera, often using the old collectible images as illustration (like I do here).  There are some nitty gritty posts aimed exclusively at collectors, typically Photo ID Guides of specific collectibles with checklists and galleries, and I will admit to a link to &lt;a href=&quot;http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?ff3=4&amp;pub=5574635227&amp;toolid=10001&amp;campid=5336480208&amp;customid=&amp;mpre=http%3A%2F%2Fstores.ebay.com%2FCollecting-Old-Magazines&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my eBay Store&lt;/a&gt; (oops, there&#039;s one now) appearing in most posts, but I don&#039;t think it&#039;s too much of a hard sell.  It&#039;s basically more of what goes on here, just aimed at the wider world of classic film.

Thanks as always my friend, Cliff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Jeffers, glad I did <em>Times Square Playboy</em> justice, told you I liked it!  I enjoyed June Travis, reminded me just a smidge of Kay Francis as well.  <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/film/2008/may/20/obituaries.usa" rel="nofollow">Here&#8217;s a little more on her</a>, the only obituary I could dig up.  It was definitely nice not to hear Barton MacLane&#8217;s teeth gritting through his standard tough guy role, not that I&#8217;m not a fan of the nastier Bart, but this made for a good change of pace.  </p>
<p>C&#8217;mon, you know you want to become a customer next.  Actually, I do a lot of mini-biographies and non-WW film reviews over on Immortal Ephemera, often using the old collectible images as illustration (like I do here).  There are some nitty gritty posts aimed exclusively at collectors, typically Photo ID Guides of specific collectibles with checklists and galleries, and I will admit to a link to <a href="http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/711-53200-19255-0/1?ff3=4&amp;pub=5574635227&amp;toolid=10001&amp;campid=5336480208&amp;customid=&amp;mpre=http%3A%2F%2Fstores.ebay.com%2FCollecting-Old-Magazines" rel="nofollow">my eBay Store</a> (oops, there&#8217;s one now) appearing in most posts, but I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s too much of a hard sell.  It&#8217;s basically more of what goes on here, just aimed at the wider world of classic film.</p>
<p>Thanks as always my friend, Cliff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffers</title>
		<link>http://warrenwilliam.com/times-square-playboy-1936/comment-page-1/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jul 2010 06:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrenwilliam.com/?p=772#comment-835</guid>
		<description>Fascinating background on the other versions of the story, and an infectious recounting of the many pluses of this movie, which I somehow felt I had enjoyed mostly BEYOND its actual merits (but then I&#039;ve only seen it once).  June Travis certainly impressed you more than she did me, and your reminding me how much I enjoyed Barton MacLane adds encouragement to see it again to give her another chance.  I still think of the film mostly as a revelation of how irresistible WW could be as just a &quot;run-of-the-mill guy&quot; at the center of a sitcom, another &quot;might have been&quot; path his career COULD have taken in major productions, even when the pre-Code &quot;classic&quot; mold of WW character could no longer be portrayed.
I do like the new site design (and appreciate seeing the rationale for it).  
Incidentally, the new &quot;Immortal Ephemera&quot; site name is BRILLIANT, but I absolutely DO NOT DARE get tempted into extending my already budget-busting collecting interests into any further territories!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fascinating background on the other versions of the story, and an infectious recounting of the many pluses of this movie, which I somehow felt I had enjoyed mostly BEYOND its actual merits (but then I&#8217;ve only seen it once).  June Travis certainly impressed you more than she did me, and your reminding me how much I enjoyed Barton MacLane adds encouragement to see it again to give her another chance.  I still think of the film mostly as a revelation of how irresistible WW could be as just a &#8220;run-of-the-mill guy&#8221; at the center of a sitcom, another &#8220;might have been&#8221; path his career COULD have taken in major productions, even when the pre-Code &#8220;classic&#8221; mold of WW character could no longer be portrayed.<br />
I do like the new site design (and appreciate seeing the rationale for it).<br />
Incidentally, the new &#8220;Immortal Ephemera&#8221; site name is BRILLIANT, but I absolutely DO NOT DARE get tempted into extending my already budget-busting collecting interests into any further territories!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

