<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Top 10 Introduction to Warren William Recommendations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://warrenwilliam.com/my-top-10-introduction-to-warren-william-recommendations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://warrenwilliam.com/my-top-10-introduction-to-warren-william-recommendations/</link>
	<description>1930&#039;s &#38; 1940&#039;s Film Star Warren William Tribute Site</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:53:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Mouthpiece</title>
		<link>http://warrenwilliam.com/my-top-10-introduction-to-warren-william-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-942</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Mouthpiece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Dec 2010 08:57:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrenwilliam.com/?p=392#comment-942</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve had my most luck with &lt;em&gt;Employees&#039; Entrance&lt;/em&gt;, John, but that may be because I hang around with a pack of fellow Scoundrels!

My only hesitation with moving &lt;em&gt;The Mouthpiece&lt;/em&gt; up the list is that the few people I&#039;ve shown it to seem to expect the shocks and it plays a little more cliche than I&#039;d like.  Not a fault of the movie, but I suppose time.

You&#039;re probably right on the first Lone Wolf, my problem is I&#039;d have a hard time sitting through that movie with whoever I was showing it to--I love Ida Lupino, but not here.  She grates on me more than I could ever imagine for some reason, like fingernails across a blackboard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had my most luck with <em>Employees&#8217; Entrance</em>, John, but that may be because I hang around with a pack of fellow Scoundrels!</p>
<p>My only hesitation with moving <em>The Mouthpiece</em> up the list is that the few people I&#8217;ve shown it to seem to expect the shocks and it plays a little more cliche than I&#8217;d like.  Not a fault of the movie, but I suppose time.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re probably right on the first Lone Wolf, my problem is I&#8217;d have a hard time sitting through that movie with whoever I was showing it to&#8211;I love Ida Lupino, but not here.  She grates on me more than I could ever imagine for some reason, like fingernails across a blackboard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Stangeland</title>
		<link>http://warrenwilliam.com/my-top-10-introduction-to-warren-william-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>John Stangeland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 2010 19:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrenwilliam.com/?p=392#comment-940</guid>
		<description>A little late to the party (only a year), but here are my 10 Warren William films for the newbie:

THE MOUTHPIECE
EMPLOYEES&#039; ENTRANCE
SKYSCRAPER SOULS
LADY FOR A DAY
THE MIND READER
CASE OF THE HOWLING DOG
DON&#039;T BET ON BLONDES
LONE WOLF SPY HUNT
THE DARK HORSE
THE MATCH KING

It&#039;s always a chore to decide what to show newcomers first. The trouble with introducing Warren William is divining the attitude of the new viewer. I&#039;ve screened Employees&#039; Entrance for a few people who hated Kurt Anderson so much that they didn&#039;t like Warren - others found it utterly compelling and thought he was great. It takes a certain temperament to appreciate him in those nasty roles. The Mouthpiece, however, never seems to fail to create an impression. I doubled it with Lady For a Day for 15 friends, and although they all enjoyed LFAD, everyone was bowled over by The Mouthpiece.  

BTW - I guess I&#039;m in kind of the minority here - I think WW is GREAT in Lady for a Day. The story clearly focuses on May Robson, but when Warren is on screen, he&#039;s brilliant. (&quot;Hmph. piERRe!&quot;)

I see your point, Cliff, about the Lone Wolf appearances, but I think that the first one probably has Warren&#039;s best (read: most disciplined) performance, and as overall entertainment is the best of the lot. After all, we&#039;re selling the newbie on WW, not Hall and Blore, et al.

Keep up the great work!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little late to the party (only a year), but here are my 10 Warren William films for the newbie:</p>
<p>THE MOUTHPIECE<br />
EMPLOYEES&#8217; ENTRANCE<br />
SKYSCRAPER SOULS<br />
LADY FOR A DAY<br />
THE MIND READER<br />
CASE OF THE HOWLING DOG<br />
DON&#8217;T BET ON BLONDES<br />
LONE WOLF SPY HUNT<br />
THE DARK HORSE<br />
THE MATCH KING</p>
<p>It&#8217;s always a chore to decide what to show newcomers first. The trouble with introducing Warren William is divining the attitude of the new viewer. I&#8217;ve screened Employees&#8217; Entrance for a few people who hated Kurt Anderson so much that they didn&#8217;t like Warren &#8211; others found it utterly compelling and thought he was great. It takes a certain temperament to appreciate him in those nasty roles. The Mouthpiece, however, never seems to fail to create an impression. I doubled it with Lady For a Day for 15 friends, and although they all enjoyed LFAD, everyone was bowled over by The Mouthpiece.  </p>
<p>BTW &#8211; I guess I&#8217;m in kind of the minority here &#8211; I think WW is GREAT in Lady for a Day. The story clearly focuses on May Robson, but when Warren is on screen, he&#8217;s brilliant. (&#8220;Hmph. piERRe!&#8221;)</p>
<p>I see your point, Cliff, about the Lone Wolf appearances, but I think that the first one probably has Warren&#8217;s best (read: most disciplined) performance, and as overall entertainment is the best of the lot. After all, we&#8217;re selling the newbie on WW, not Hall and Blore, et al.</p>
<p>Keep up the great work!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Mouthpiece</title>
		<link>http://warrenwilliam.com/my-top-10-introduction-to-warren-william-recommendations/comment-page-1/#comment-756</link>
		<dc:creator>The_Mouthpiece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://warrenwilliam.com/?p=392#comment-756</guid>
		<description>Hey Rick29, thanks so much!  I just hit the Google follow button on your site and will add you to the blogroll before I log off tonight--looks like some great stuff over there!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Rick29, thanks so much!  I just hit the Google follow button on your site and will add you to the blogroll before I log off tonight&#8211;looks like some great stuff over there!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

